Writing your first paper: start with the basics

By Karen J. Cloetekaren

iThemba Laboratory for Accelerator Based Sciences, National Research Foundation, kcloete[at]tlabs.ac.za; kaboutercloete[at]gmail.com


One of the most important outputs in a researcher’s career is the number of publications in high impact, international peer-reviewed journals. Getting published leads to promotions, the development of new ideas, sometimes instigates new collaborations, and – importantly – advances the scientific field. If your work is not published, you may as well never have done the research. However, writing a research paper is often an anxiety-provoking and daunting task, so that many important research findings never reach the print stage.

The most important barrier to writing is the lack of writing skills, which are often not taught at undergraduate or postgraduate level. So what do you do if you, as a young researcher, also never received this vital training?

Improve your writing skills: Don’t do it alone.

Before taking on a first big writing assignment, ask for guidance and advice from colleagues, co-authors, mentors, or supervisors. Supervisors often offer invaluable advice when it comes to writing papers at the masters or doctoral level. Even colleagues from other fields will be able to help you develop your paper, as an “outsider” not deeply involved in the study can easily spot where your writing and ideas are unclear.  However, beware of submitting a lengthy piece of badly written work to another busy researcher – rather submit a small piece of writing (like the introduction) for thorough review and comment.

Another approach to improve your writing skills is by joining a writing group. Just beware: transforming writing into a social activity may only be suited for those with a certain personality type. In such writing groups, draft versions of your paper may be disseminated among the group members for comment and discussion. Some universities may also offer a tutoring service for writing in which experienced students tutor or mentor inexperienced students in drafting a dissertation or first paper for publication. Offering your skills in such a way may be an invaluable learning experience for reviewing your own work.

It is also important to be exposed to diverse opportunities for learning and publishing research. This should be done early in the research career. Attend as many writing workshops as possible, covering different topics related to the writing and publishing of research. Even if you think you know how to write, you will always gain new ideas from good workshops or tutorials.

Work a bit differently.

Technology can also help. Software tools and resources for academic writing may be an invaluable resource in assisting with the writing process. I have listed a few useful tools below:

Mindnode

Software tool develop for structuring ideas when brainstorming

Freemind

Free software tool to assist with mind-mapping

Rationale

Software developed for argument mapping that enables the structure of an argument to be displayed graphically

LaTeX and LyX 

Software developed to serve as document preparation tools

Research Writer by ActiveScholar

A writing tool developed for academic writing enabling you to capture, maintain, and organize research information

Docear-The Academic Literature Suite

An open source tool that assists you in organizing, creating and discovering academic literature

Mendeley

A free bibliography and academic social networking tool

After you have honed your writing skills, you can use your time more efficiently when writing up a paper. It will also become easier to publish good papers, have successful grant applications, and enable you to become a good reviewer or editor of a journal. Most importantly, being a good writer will generate respect from your peers.

 

“Either write something worth reading or do something worth writing.”

– Benjamin Franklin

 

Paradigm shifts in science: are we ready?

Science — great science — takes time. I am not talking about the actual time it takes to conduct research, write a research paper, and if the wind is blowing that day have it published sans correction in a reputable journal. Here I am talking about the time it takes for that great, paradigm-shifting idea to take hold and rock the academic world. You see, as scientists we are sceptical and methodical by nature and training. This means that we are surprisingly slow at really accepting revolutionary new ideas, or even proposing them, until the weight of evidence (painstakingly collected!) is on our side. Despite what many people think, true scientific innovation is therefore slow. And some people suggest we should slow down even further…

This year marks twenty-four years since the hologenome concept of evolution was first publicly introduced[1]. The notion that small microbial organisms inhabit ever part of our body is now widely accepted (the good, the bad, and the REALLY bad). However, what most people are not aware of, is that the genome (all genetic material) of these microbes interacts with our genome. Because these microbes live in/on our bodies, the collective term of their genome and ours is “hologenome”. To many evolutionary biologists and evolutionary ecologists this idea of the hologenome is intuitive, but very few scientist are working on understanding how the hologenome can be acted upon by evolutionary processes – few people are examining how the hologenome might impact the creation of new species, dispersal/migration of species, divergence within species, and selection imposed upon the species by the environment.

As I mentioned in my previously blog post here and here, I consider myself an ecologist — an evolutionary ecologist to be exact. As a result, my current Ph.D work is focused on understanding and developing techniques/approaches that can be used to engineer the hologenome to improve plant health. I am interested in unlocking the hidden the mysteries of the hologenome. I play around with plant genetics and microbial genetics to understand which evolutionary processes shape their interactions. There are still far too few scientists interested in understanding these interactions.

Which leaves me wondering: Is it time to change the way we operate as a scientific community? Could we speed up the process of discovering truly ground-breaking ideas like E=mc2, evolution, the structure of DNA, epigenetics? Are we ready to embrace the idea of truly collaboration across disciplines and skills sets, creating scientific ‘melting pots’ that could accelerate the process of discovery and creation? Or are we too set in our ways?

[1] Richard Jefferson first introduced the concept at a public meeting in 1994