Supervisors are like coffee…. See why!

By Roula Inglesi-Lotz

As a student, I thought the most important element towards completion of a PhD is… Who else? The student. Only after wearing the famous red cape at my PhD graduation, did I started realising how much a supervisor is a “make it or break it” factor. No, it is not because nowadays I play for the other side! It’s mostly due to discussions with other doctorate holders or PhD students. I found out that my progress and excitement for my PhD was highly due to my supervisor (thank you Prof James Blignaut!); others also identified mentorship as the reason for completing their PhD fast, or slow, or enjoying the process (from a 2017 postgraduate experience survey).

From the other side of the field now, we heard as academics many times the statement, “We are the lecturers or supervisors we had.” I find more inspiring, “We strive to be the lecturers or supervisors we always wanted.” For a few years now, hence, I have been wondering what type of a supervisor I am and what my style is. I compared myself with my supervisors, my experienced colleagues, and I analysed my personality to understand better. Within this introspection and analysis, I concluded that supervisors are like coffee… Let me explain myself.

They come in different varieties.

If you thought, that all supervisors are the same, you will be in for a surprise. Supervisors are human beings (surprise?!?!?!) and they come with their own experiences background and beliefs. The Ethiopian coffee blend is not the same as the Kenyan, for example. One is not superior to the other; they are all different. Do you remember the last time in your life that you became obsessed with drinking that special macchiato from a specific shop EVERY SINGLE DAY for months because you loved it and you swore that is the best for you, and then you did not want to even see it? That is sometimes the case with supervisory (and lecturing) styles too – you might swear that this one is the ultimate for you until you try another one.

They can be stronger, weaker or even decaf.

Continuing within the concept of diversity, the strength of the coffee or the choice of decaf can also be linked to supervisors. Some are definitely stronger and more disciplined. They expect the students to work autonomously and take criticism and upsets in the research process with equal strength. The “espressos” plan in advance, work on schedules and are not flexible. They can work well with students that are equally structured, but might restrict a free spirit. The “decafs” on the other side tend to be more relaxed, give more freedom both in context and in time, and do not check on progress regularly.

Same coffee, different preferences (milk or sugar)

Most academics have established through the years their own supervisor personas (variety of coffee and strength of the blend). BUT, what helps tremendously is the adaptability of the coffee to the consumer’s personal preferences: sugar or not, and how much, brown or white sugar, or milk, maybe cremora? In essence, the supervisor has some core characteristics, but they do adjust (somewhat) to the needs and particular conditions of the student. When the student is an introvert and likes to work independently, the supervisor will not assist much if he/ she checks the progress frequently; on the other side, a student might need a constant support both academically and personally (add some sugar and milk extra, please).

 They get bitter if you do not stir.

Self-explanatory characteristic of the metaphor, right? Disappearing for months and then trying to pick up where you left it might create uneasiness with your supervisor (same from the other side, of course). Frequent communication and collaboration is essential in the relationship supervisor- student. “Like a marriage”, says Darce Gillie, from the University of Sheffield, a supervisor-PhD student relationship needs “honest communication, trust, understanding, shared goals, and the ability to compromise”.

If you don’t have one, you get headaches.

From the coffee-side, the doctors might diagnose caffeine addiction, while from doctoral studies perspective; there is absolutely no way to complete a PhD without a supervisor, or with an absent one. If the student knew everything in advance or had confidence that can surpass all the uphills of research, then why do a PhD? Ready-made academic! Some will argue here that their supervisor was mostly absent from the process and hence, no particular contribution should be attributed to them. I have one thing to tell them: the days I do not drink coffee, I drink tea or water, meaning some way or another, we all had a mentor whose experience, advice, and knowledge contributed to our PhD research.

Choosing coffee is of course much easier than choosing a supervisor.

Firstly, it is the start of a long-term relationship and secondly, you do not know someone until you get to work with them. If you need to choose your supervisor, the first step is to have an idea of the research topic that interests you, even broadly. Next, look for the experts in this field that are willing to supervise PhD students. If the topic interests the supervisor as well, mission accomplished. Supervisors tend to work more with students when they are also interested to answer these questions AND the extra bonus, the students learn more from informal discussions.  If you find one or two that have what you want, go see them all. You will get a better feeling of them as people, and personal chemistry plays a role. (Find your supervisor Table)

Finally, just remind yourself, a PhD journey is difficult. It has ups and downs, that is a given. As a PhD student, make sure you choose the right coffee to give you energy, excitement, inspiration, and keep you awake and focus. However, the coffee is not really, what makes you accomplish anything that day – it’s your own drive and persistence.

Dear fellow supervisors, my suggestion is not to be stiff “coffees” that leave their drinkers with the jitters. Try to be warm and boosting ones.

Let’s serve coffee with a little – or even better, over cake – to make the journey enjoyable.

coffee
source: giphy.com

Supervisors are a nightmare…

I have often heard people talking about supervisors being a nightmare. Most often it’s supervisoralluded that supervisors are looking out for their own interests rather than those of the student. Furthermore, they may be the sole reason why the students would quit their graduate programs and look for alternative opportunities. I am still with my initial supervisor, so I guess this relationship is working out…maybe?

This year I met one of the finest minds of our generations — at least that is what he appears to be! He’s trained in ornithology but his research interests have spread farther than that. He has allowed himself to explore any field and opportunity that may be connected or share a boundary with his field of interest. To my eyes he is one of the researchers that we need to make academic life fashionable (so to speak). But he’s the kind of person who develops new-world problem solvers rather than research and academic robots. Of course, I may be biased, because I think I think the way he thinks 😉

HelpingBut, he isn’t my supervisor – I am an ecotoxicologist at heart. And this meant I’ve had to adjust to a supervisor I didn’t choose for myself. There was a new lecturer in the department, and since his research interests aligned perfectly with mine, he was assigned as my supervisor.

At first I was okay with this but once I got to sit down with this new person and got down to work, it became my worst nightmare. I could not, for the life of me, understand what the student-supervisor relationship meant to him. For example, when deciding on the title of my research project, we sat and discussed what I wanted to do and streamlined my objectives. When it came to the title I sent him my suggested titles, as my former supervisor had trained me to, and requested his input. He just sent me a totally new title and said, “Use that one.” Sitting alone I thought to myself, “Am I a messenger now?” Well, I did go to ask him about it but that’s the story for another day. It was many other things that just put me off. The whole situation became extremely tense, but just recently I came to a few realizations that are helping me to learn from my new position.

Firstly, I am a student. I have a responsibility and a duty to learn, grow my network and develop myself. I cannot learn all of these from one person. More so, exposure to different work ethics and understanding why people do certain things and how they do them is an integral part of academic growth.

Secondly, nobody is the same. You can have two people coming from the same training and are doing the exact same research but you will find that they will still behave differently and will approach their research differently. This is about my academic growth and development. It is not about who is on the other end and what they do. They may not be the best of supervisors in the whole world because maybe they too are still learning, but they have something to offer too.

Communication is just as important as doing research. So much of what I’ve learned about research, overcoming mistakes, and working with somebody new came from the fact that I could summon my courage and talk to my supervisor. No matter the supervisor, s/he can’t always instigate conversation or know what’s troubling you if you don’t speak up.

It is also important to have people around to talk to about your challenges as a student. I have academic mentors, friends in academia who are integral part of my journey. They not only help me get through the rough academic progress but also call me to order whenever I lose my professionalism.

20170629_121353

That leads to the final bit of truth: even students are professionals. An undergraduate student recently said, “We are professional students”. It was quite funny at the time but now I realize that being a postgraduate student also means being a professional student. This means respect to fellow students and supervisors, time management skill and communication skill. Moreover, it also highlights mannerism and the importance of good self-conduct.

This is how I keep winning. This is how I keep going back to the lab and working to develop myself as an academic.