Part 2: activities to practice and improve your #scicomm skills

I attended the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting in Chicago, 2014. Although this meeting is not directly open to the public, many of the sessions were recorded and broadcast. In addition, this conference was enormous, covering many facets of science, with fairly general sessions overall, completely different than the highly specialized conferences I had been to previously. Despite the generalization, many of the presentations were catered toward small, specific audiences, failing to reach scientists and journalists from other backgrounds.

chicago-aaas_14170477407_o2014_annual_meeting_chicago_carousel

One presentation from a session about climate change stands out in my memory: I was a ‘session aid’—a role they give some students to reduce the registration fees—and during the presentation someone from the audience asked me if there was evaluation/feedback forms because she was not able to follow the presentation at all. Unfortunately there were not any forms for that kind of feedback, so the presenter probably continues to lose his audience today.

I don’t remember much about the presentation (surprise), but I do remember the presenter used diagrams directly from their publications throughout the talk. Such diagrams (modeling changing climates, etc.) can be pretty complex, obscuring the main point of each slide, limiting the audience to those who would read their publication.

The point is not that everyone needs to communicate science better. This presenter was undoubtedly on the front line of scientific discovery, making climate change projections, and advancing knowledge—a noble, traditional scientist. But, the point is that sometimes you may want to cater your talk to a broader audience. The purpose of this blog post is to provide ideas for practicing communication with broader audiences, ultimately helping you avoid creating stories similar to this one. Bear in mind, I’m not an expert, but I have not been afraid to dabble in science communication myself. And I have the benefit of still being a student; learning is all I do…

Participate in a #scicomm training course or workshop:

I know about some of the science communication workshops available in SA, but if you know of more, comment below so other readers can find out about them.

  • Pretoria: The University of Pretoria hosted a Media Skills workshop for post-graduate students in May 2016. The workshop was organized by Science Link and was designed to help scientists work with the media. Science Link will organize similar workshops for other universities. Attending the workshop at UP was free for post-grads, but the university had to pay for Science Link to organize the activity.

logo-sciencelink-site

  • Online (Stellenbosch): There is an incredible, local online training course starting in September. The program, ‘Science communication: An introduction to theory, best practice and practical skills,’ is a six-week online course accepting applications until August 1st. It is led by members of the Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology (CREST) and the Department of Journalism. Unfortunately, the course is not free, but the cost is worth the training.

scicom_logo_green1crest_logo_blue_smaller

For free training resources, I recommend following the Science Communication Africa group on Facebook or occasionally browsing the #scicomm hashtag on twitter. There is a pretty big science communication movement internationally, so there are a lot of resources out there.

Screen Shot 2016-06-24 at 9.39.06 AM

Join or create a #scicomm group

The CREST group at Stellenbosch University, mentioned previously, is an excellent example of a group of science communication specialists. The group organizes a regular public seminar that often features talks about communicating science. This group would be difficult to clone, but you can organize or join a more ‘light-weight’ group that serves a similar purpose if your institute or university doesn’t have one already. For example, while I was at Oregon State, I was part of a voluntary science communication steering committee that organized and offered a monthly brown-bag-lunch (bring your own lunch) seminar featuring various speakers (lecturers, researchers, media specialists, journalists, etc.) from around the university. This group organized seminars about interviewing tips, science writing, crowdfunding, science engagement and much more. All it takes to start a group like this is to email some media specialists asking them to prepare a talk to help scientists communicate with them, and finding a venue. And believe it or not, your university (however tiny) probably has a public communications section.

Compete!

If you are a Post-graduate, there are many competitions about communicating your thesis (FAMELab, TEDx, etc.). These competitions generally require you to present the importance of your thesis in 3 minutes or less, sometimes without any help from power point or video footage. Although this may be the most daunting way to present information, it is probably the best science communication practice you could ever have. Other competitions also exist where you create and submit videos, which may be a little less daunting, but requires more post-production. For example, here is a competition where you actually dance your thesis: http://gonzolabs.org/dance/ —it’s a form of communication, right? Would you dance your thesis for $500 USD?

Screen Shot 2016-06-24 at 9.59.27 AM

Screen Shot 2016-06-24 at 9.56.55 AM

dance-banner

#FAMEClub is a combination of the two activities mentioned above. Innovator and leader, Darryl Herron, organized a sort of journal club called #FAMEClub that invites post-graduate students at University of Pretoria to select and present recent science publications in less than 3 minutes, then having a discussion about the topic. After a few weeks of presenters, the group hosts a competition, open to anyone at UP, to see who can communicate the importance of their selected paper the best, under 3 minutes of course. I participated in the first competition, but I didn’t win. So it goes.

Just this week (June 20, 2016) a science writing competition was announced (great timing). Science Today is a competition for post-graduate students studying in South Africa to be recognized one of the country’s best post-graduate science writers. The deadline for applying, submitting a short essay, is July 20th. Submitting an essay for this competition will be good practice because it requires you to write for a broad, popular audience.

Screen Shot 2016-06-23 at 4.48.33 PM

Write to the public

Speaking of writing, it doesn’t have to be a competition to be good practice. Some news platforms, specifically thinking of The Conversation, help scientists write for a broader audience. The Conversation has an Africa-focused pilot section and I hear their editors are exceptionally helpful and brilliant when it comes to the final touches of a writing piece. It is a platform where scientists or specialists write articles, which are then made available for free to journalist and news sources to republish. I think of it as a pseudo press release. Try it out! Try submitting an article on The Conversation to supplement and summarize your next journal publication, then see if the feedback from the editors helps you learn/practice communicating science.

Screen Shot 2016-06-23 at 4.50.55 PMOk, remember Science Link? Well they have a little sister called SciBraai. SciBraai is an awesome platform for helping scientists connect with the rest of the society. Last year, I had the opportunity to attend an actual braai hosted by SciBraai, where they divided the 20+ participants in several mixed groups containing scientists, tech specialists, and journalists. The goal of the afternoon was to use open-access data to present and write a popular media article with your team. This activity, mixing scientists with tech specialists and journalists face-to-face, was excellent practice. SciBraai deserves some serious credit for the novelty and ability to make such an incredible event work. Keep your eye out for more activities organized by SciBraai, especially if you want to team up with journalists or improve your #scicomm skills.

Screen Shot 2016-06-23 at 4.47.14 PM

Reach out

Outreach activities are great for sharing science and research, possibly inspiring and educating visitors, but they are also prime opportunities for science communication practice. Below are a few outreach activities where the success depends on the science communication.

Science expos provide opportunities to put up a booth or table and tell people about ongoing research projects. The Science Forum in South Africa is an example of an expo, providing opportunities to institutes, departments, and research groups to table. Tabling at SciFest Africa, an expo aimed at engaging youth, is another opportunity to practice science communication.

SAMSUNG

Tabling doesn’t have to be limited to science expos though. Craft and farmers markets also provide a good venue for outreach, reaching out to the people who don’t go to science expos. Imagine if your department or institute had a booth at a craft market every weekend. Students could rotate, each spending a couple mornings of the year promoting your research and practicing communicating to the public. Talking to the public about your research is more fun than you might think.

Ecology programs could take tabling even further by going outside to trailheads or nature reserves, engaging vacationers in their own turf, where they can physically see what you are researching. This would be great for raising awareness about invasive species, for example. “Go outdoors for science!

These ideas came to me during a crowd-funding campaign where I raised money and support for our research project. Crowd-funding is a concept where you ask many people to chip in little amounts of money to reach a goal and fund a project. More than 70 people contributed to reach our goal of $5000 USD. Here is the link, incase you are interested. I spent many hours at markets and trailheads telling people about what we were raising money for and why it is important to have their support. It is because of this experience that I also suggest crowd-funding campaigns are great practice for science communication. Fundraising is fundraising, but it was a good experience for me, and I certainly, in a free-choice way, grew as a science communicator.

Screen Shot 2016-06-24 at 10.07.32 AM

I met an English teacher at the South African Science Forum last year. ‘What brought you to the Science Forum?’ I asked, because he wasn’t directly involved in a field of science. He told me he was trying to network because he had an engineering hobby and wanted to share some ideas. How amazing is that? We should organize more science symposia that are open to the public. For example, if a post-graduate research symposium was advertised to the public, and the students were asked to present to a broader audience, it would be great practice for science communication. I am not suggesting every symposium should be, just one a year or so, because students need to learn to communicate technically as well, but imagine a symposium where every presentation explained how the research fit into the big picture.

Screen Shot 2016-06-23 at 4.49.01 PMWhen I first arrived in South Africa there was a series of seminars organized by the NRF titled ‘Science for Society’. Each of the seminars was broadcast over SAfm, challenging the speakers to not only give a presentation, but to keep the interest of an audience that couldn’t see the power-point slides. What will you do if you are asked to give this sort of seminar? Could you give a presentation without slides? Fortunately there are ways to practice this type of presenting, although there could be a lot more opportunities. Radio interviews are one form of practice. I gave a radio interview about our research proposal to promote our crowd-funding campaign and all I did was email the radio station. However, South Africa could use more platforms for scientists to reach out over the airwaves. For example, we could start a program similar to Inspiration Dissemination, a radio show that invites post-graduates to share their stories and introduce their research live over the air. OR we could create a science podcast, similar to radiolab that focuses on research produced in South Africa. These sort of programs would increase the accessibility of science to the public and provide a platform for science communication practice.

joeyandzhina

Screen Shot 2016-06-24 at 10.12.40 AM

Finally, the best for last: science pubs. I have wanted to organize a science pub ever since I first attended Science Pub Corvallis in 2014. If you enjoy talking science and consuming products of fermentation, then science pubs are for you! For those in the Western Cape Province, Pint of Science South Africa is an annual event featuring several nights of science talks at different pubs throughout Cape Town. More regularly, the Science Café Cape Town organizes monthly seminars. Science pubs like these are great opportunities to practice communicating science. You will undoubtedly engage people outside of your field, drawing some interesting questions, and requiring you to communicate broadly.

c4d655_cc812bbd2e004d0eb2e891324206101b

Well there are a few ideas, cobbled together in a really long blog post. Feel free to contact me in regards to any of it, especially if you have the time put any of these ideas into action.

Part 1: four reasons to improve your #scicomm skills

Most people aren’t scientists. And scientists love to split metaphorical (and literal) hairs amongst themselves, creating a barrier of jargon and statistics between themselves and the rest of the world. But in the current era of information overload, all people create their own hypotheses, their own ideas, and draw their own conclusions based on whatever unverified information is out there. And, more and more, this means that the average person does not trust the average scientist.

SciComm

It is becoming crucial for scientists themselves to speak up, because science should not be hidden, mysterious, unintelligible. Below I have listed four reasons for improving our science communication skills, effectively improving the accessibility of science. If you have more reasons, I encourage you to comment below.

Improve democracy

The success and effectiveness of democracy depends on the education of the voters. The more innovative, skillful, and knowledgeable the voting population is, the stronger the democracy. Making an effort to increase the accessibility of science will enhance the education system, inform more decisions, and promote innovation. Science also provides opportunities to improve citizenship. Involving the public in, or effectively sharing about the scientific process will improve democracy.

ResearchCitizenship

 Inspire the next generation

Many of the tips for communicating science (e.g. less jargon, shorter sentences, etc.) essentially lower the reading level required for understanding science writing, thereby improving accessibility and reaching younger audiences. Thus, improving our science communication skills will enable us to reach and inspire a younger audience.

In addition, social media is widely recognized as a tool for communicating science and has been described as the language of the youth. Mastering outreach on these platforms requires improving science communication skills (e.g. introducing a paper with only 140 characters on Twitter), but will likely reach youth that wouldn’t have known about our research otherwise.

Adapt to shifts in funding

More and more, the importance of this skill is being recognized, with top-down calls for more science engagement and ‘science for society’. Requirements from grant-funding agencies are, right now, changing! For example, many project proposals have to commit to disseminating the outcomes to society or incorporate ‘broader impacts’, such as mentoring a student or conducting educational outreach.

I was first introduced to the ‘broader impacts’ requirement when applying for the National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program in the US. Each proposal required a section titled ‘Broader Impacts’ where I was meant to explain how my project would immediately benefit society, aside from the results of the research. Educational outreach and public engagement are ideal criteria for this section, and both of these activities heavily depend on science communication skills. To my knowledge, the NSF now requires a statement of broader impacts on every proposal.

Ensure accuracy

The final reason I suggest improving your science communication ability is so that you can share your own research yourself. Regardless of how good external science communicators are (science journalists, media specialists, marketing agents, public relations, etc.), the scientists that did the research have the best understanding of its significance. Inevitably, like the ‘telephone’ game we played when we were children, the message gets distorted the farther it gets from the source. Results are commonly reported inaccurately in media because the writers aren’t scientists, and they want to sell issues rather than report results. Generally, the results aren’t distorted, but the relativity, representation, and implications are.

The personal justification for me to spend time practicing and improving my science communication comes from the same part of the heart as my passion for research. If you are like me, having pursued a career of research as a means to make a positive impact on the planet, I am confident fine-tuning your ability to communicate science will increase the size of that impact. Together we can improve the face of science in the public eye, inspiring others and informing more decisions, while learning to make the most of the world we live in for the people around us.