PhD and the millennial…

I just watched a very engaging TED talk about millennials and all the things that are supposedly wrong with my generation, those born between 1980 and 2000. Apparently there are characteristics that we possess that are so different from the generations before, which affect how we live and work. People have started consultancies specialising in training companies on employing and getting the most out of millennials. Really, how special could a generation be? But all of this noise about millennials made me wonder how my “PhD personality” could be affected by the fact that I fall into this generation.

Apparently there isn’t much difference among millennials around the world.  “Each country’s millennials are different, but because of globalisation, social media, the exporting of Western culture and the speed of change, millennials worldwide are more similar to one another than to older generations within their nations”. And, looking at socioeconomics, “…these aren’t just rich-kid problems: poor millennials have even higher rates of narcissism, materialism and technology addiction in their ghetto-fabulous lives”. This is according to this very, very detailed Time article based on existing academic research on the millennial generation.

You’ve already had a little foreshadowing with that Time quote. Narcissism.  Materialism. Technology Addiction. There’s also laziness, entitlement and desire for instant gratification and recognition…If these things are real, I should recognise them and deal with the problem head on.

Take instant gratification and recognition for instance. If the need for constant gratification and recognition of one’s efforts is deeply entrenched in the millennial, then it might be problematic for our PhD completion journey. What we work for takes a few years to complete.  And along the way are research tasks that often take longer than we planned, challenging analysis, the frustrating writing process and so on. This leaves very little room for instant gratification. Which can very quickly lead to de-motivation.  But there are things which give us little wins along the way, depending on how you define that for yourself.  I experienced a huge boost in motivation when I published my first article from my first stream of data.  And every time I attend a conference, writing seminar or networking event I feel energised. They are little boosts along the way that make me stop and appreciate what I have already achieved, and look forward to more.

One of the positives that stand out to me is the collaborative spirit of millennials. It means that the future of science is in good hands then, with researchers that thrive in team work – joint grants, publications etc. And if millennials are really more liberal, open-minded and accepting of others it means we may expect and foster non-discriminative work environments and collaborations where all voices matter. I value diversity in my friendships, I like adding my voice to politicised public health issues (mostly through my Twitter, but it’s okay). Millennials are involved in decolonisation conversations not just about education but practice and power relations in public health/ science collaboration. There is a call to be exactly this type of millennial PhD. Our idealism and need to be seen makes us ideal candidates to bring visibility and traction to causes.

I was thinking the other day of how a simple thing like a community garden project actually contributes to the continuum of care, which is what my research is based on. This is a need I observe in my township and have read about similar projects elsewhere. Projects such as Siyakhana tie academic research to community projects that improve food security and social development. This is just one example; many more abound across the country and are just a Google search away. These projects address the poverty and malnutrition that lead to poor health among our people.  So it is important for us to be present, whether it is making an issue trend on social media or grass roots initiatives with big societal impact. Millennials are the ones for the job.

So here’s to millennials, may our optimism help us pick ourselves up when the PhD journey gets too hard. May our oversharing help us cope with life’s problems and change cultures for the better. May our fear of missing out keep us connected to important issues, and not just entertainment. And may we learn how to keep at it, and be a little bit patient. We need it. Especially for the PhD.

Supervisors are like coffee…. See why!

By Roula Inglesi-Lotz

As a student, I thought the most important element towards completion of a PhD is… Who else? The student. Only after wearing the famous red cape at my PhD graduation, did I started realising how much a supervisor is a “make it or break it” factor. No, it is not because nowadays I play for the other side! It’s mostly due to discussions with other doctorate holders or PhD students. I found out that my progress and excitement for my PhD was highly due to my supervisor (thank you Prof James Blignaut!); others also identified mentorship as the reason for completing their PhD fast, or slow, or enjoying the process (from a 2017 postgraduate experience survey).

From the other side of the field now, we heard as academics many times the statement, “We are the lecturers or supervisors we had.” I find more inspiring, “We strive to be the lecturers or supervisors we always wanted.” For a few years now, hence, I have been wondering what type of a supervisor I am and what my style is. I compared myself with my supervisors, my experienced colleagues, and I analysed my personality to understand better. Within this introspection and analysis, I concluded that supervisors are like coffee… Let me explain myself.

They come in different varieties.

If you thought, that all supervisors are the same, you will be in for a surprise. Supervisors are human beings (surprise?!?!?!) and they come with their own experiences background and beliefs. The Ethiopian coffee blend is not the same as the Kenyan, for example. One is not superior to the other; they are all different. Do you remember the last time in your life that you became obsessed with drinking that special macchiato from a specific shop EVERY SINGLE DAY for months because you loved it and you swore that is the best for you, and then you did not want to even see it? That is sometimes the case with supervisory (and lecturing) styles too – you might swear that this one is the ultimate for you until you try another one.

They can be stronger, weaker or even decaf.

Continuing within the concept of diversity, the strength of the coffee or the choice of decaf can also be linked to supervisors. Some are definitely stronger and more disciplined. They expect the students to work autonomously and take criticism and upsets in the research process with equal strength. The “espressos” plan in advance, work on schedules and are not flexible. They can work well with students that are equally structured, but might restrict a free spirit. The “decafs” on the other side tend to be more relaxed, give more freedom both in context and in time, and do not check on progress regularly.

Same coffee, different preferences (milk or sugar)

Most academics have established through the years their own supervisor personas (variety of coffee and strength of the blend). BUT, what helps tremendously is the adaptability of the coffee to the consumer’s personal preferences: sugar or not, and how much, brown or white sugar, or milk, maybe cremora? In essence, the supervisor has some core characteristics, but they do adjust (somewhat) to the needs and particular conditions of the student. When the student is an introvert and likes to work independently, the supervisor will not assist much if he/ she checks the progress frequently; on the other side, a student might need a constant support both academically and personally (add some sugar and milk extra, please).

 They get bitter if you do not stir.

Self-explanatory characteristic of the metaphor, right? Disappearing for months and then trying to pick up where you left it might create uneasiness with your supervisor (same from the other side, of course). Frequent communication and collaboration is essential in the relationship supervisor- student. “Like a marriage”, says Darce Gillie, from the University of Sheffield, a supervisor-PhD student relationship needs “honest communication, trust, understanding, shared goals, and the ability to compromise”.

If you don’t have one, you get headaches.

From the coffee-side, the doctors might diagnose caffeine addiction, while from doctoral studies perspective; there is absolutely no way to complete a PhD without a supervisor, or with an absent one. If the student knew everything in advance or had confidence that can surpass all the uphills of research, then why do a PhD? Ready-made academic! Some will argue here that their supervisor was mostly absent from the process and hence, no particular contribution should be attributed to them. I have one thing to tell them: the days I do not drink coffee, I drink tea or water, meaning some way or another, we all had a mentor whose experience, advice, and knowledge contributed to our PhD research.

Choosing coffee is of course much easier than choosing a supervisor.

Firstly, it is the start of a long-term relationship and secondly, you do not know someone until you get to work with them. If you need to choose your supervisor, the first step is to have an idea of the research topic that interests you, even broadly. Next, look for the experts in this field that are willing to supervise PhD students. If the topic interests the supervisor as well, mission accomplished. Supervisors tend to work more with students when they are also interested to answer these questions AND the extra bonus, the students learn more from informal discussions.  If you find one or two that have what you want, go see them all. You will get a better feeling of them as people, and personal chemistry plays a role. (Find your supervisor Table)

Finally, just remind yourself, a PhD journey is difficult. It has ups and downs, that is a given. As a PhD student, make sure you choose the right coffee to give you energy, excitement, inspiration, and keep you awake and focus. However, the coffee is not really, what makes you accomplish anything that day – it’s your own drive and persistence.

Dear fellow supervisors, my suggestion is not to be stiff “coffees” that leave their drinkers with the jitters. Try to be warm and boosting ones.

Let’s serve coffee with a little – or even better, over cake – to make the journey enjoyable.

coffee
source: giphy.com